Marcia Kia Simpson-James.
Today we see yet more evidence, that proves that Britain is the most racist country in the world. A Black, Dark-Skinned Councillor, in Bristol was convicted of Racially Aggravated Harassment.
Apparently she had hurt the feelings of a 'sensitive' light-skinned asian woman.
The Asian, a fellow councillor on Bristol City Council, had the deciding vote, in deciding whether or not a project that dealt with the legacy of slavery would survive. She voted along party lines (she being a Conservative), and the funding for the Black project was pulled.
The Black, dark-skinned Councillor, Shirley Brown, a Lib Dem, found herself outnumbered as the sole Black councillor throughout the entire City of Bristol Council. As the full realisation of the situation hit her, she calmly told the full council chamber that she felt that the racist asian woman, would be considered a "coconut" by the Black and asian community.
The asian conservative woman, named Jay Jethwa, an immigrant, had willing joined with her all-white colleagues, to 'eliminate' the well-loved Black project. At the time, she was not at all upset, and the term is not particularly horrific. In fact, this kind of word usage is common parlance in various communities, and would be considered a slang term used to cut to the chase.
As mentioned above, light-skinned asian woman, 'an immigrant', was not upset and left the chamber afterwards without any incidence. However, some white council workers and her political colleagues, asked the council for the CCTV film, (Blacks-Under-Surveillance (BUS) stylee). It was only after several goes that they picked up on the 'term'.
It was only then, after a political nudge, that Ms Jay Jethwa, complained to the police. They then decided to charge Ms Brown with Racially Aggravated Harassment.
Let us examine the case. Ms Brown, was the only Black person in the room. She used the world "Coconut" , she left the council chamber without any further mention of the term or the fact that an almost all-white racist council had closed down one of the few remaining 'Black' projects in Bristol.
Some time down the line, she was confronted by racist police, preparing to charge her with racially aggravated harassment. These officers were backed by the proven racist Crown Prosecution Service. She went to court, and she was "convicted".
In other words, the name of the game was to discredit her. Making any words spoken by her null and void.
Now let us look at the history of that law. Do you remember , the racist SUS laws -police harassment; the Riots- complaints of 'aggravated police harassment; the Stephen Lawrence murder-police "aggravated" police neglect & sustained long-term police harassment of Black victims of crime; the Police Complaints Authority (PCA) - who never took any Black complaints seriously, and even helped 'convict' some of the Black victims of police brutality; police and court official corruption; police drug-dealing-pimping? etc, etc.
Well, if you do, you will remember that all these socio-political events revolved around miscreant police officers, and their high levels of misconduct being backed by the courts (Judges and Magistrates), and that racist law-making machine called Parliament.
Well, this is no history lesson, these things are alive and kicking, and being exploited by racist asians, muslims, mixed-racists, and even africans.
Back in the day, when "West Indians" were fighting against 'Teddy-boys", 'The NF", "The British Movement", "Combat 18", etc, the above mentioned groups of "Ethnics" called us "trouble-makers".
However, when a racist asians required "defending", they would rush into the Black community, and "bawl, holler and scream" for "West Indian" "Help". When the danger was gone, they would regress to their natural racist state, and they would treat every Black person who entered their shops as thieves and crooks.
Then the whole cyle would start again. You know the drill, panicky asian rushing into the "West Indian" community begging for our "protection" against racist whites, after incident, they went 'back to their normal'.
I am not aware of them complaining that Black people 'harassed' them. In fact, they 'racially and sexually harassed' Black "West Indian" people specifically of Jamaican background and descent.
Over time, I began to hear Black people describe asians as "Black". I would ask, 'How can an asian be Black?". The usual, lazy, and offensive response that came back was that "they were politically Black". Incredible! Unbelievable!
Ms Brown has lived to rue the day, Black people thought that they, and a proven racist asian community had anything in common outside of the curry house. The fact is, Black people are not asians, and asians are not Black, no matter which way you slice it!
Unfortunately, there are still too many Black people who swallowed that white-invented and promoted pill.
Now we find ourselves in the situation, where the racist white man, and their 'light-skinned' caucasoid brethren have practically eliminated full-Black people from the public space.
For example, I received a call from a white American colleague, who worked quite high up in the administration. He was traumatised. He asked me for some kind of explanation as to why, when such and such an official had arranged to meet some "Black" british officials, leaders, etc, he, and his colleagues were confronted with a room full of "asians". He went onto express his outrage at being "duped" by the british and shocked that there was "not even one Black person involved".
I told him the truth, which was that Britain is the most racist country in the world. My America friend's response to this news, was "Wow! They're that bad are they?" I said "Yes".
On the matter, of the courts being used as a political tool to 'eliminate' "Black" people from participating in public discourse, this is old news.
Its common sense isn't it. Get busy "convicting Blacks", and then they will not be able to get a job, "because they have a conviction"; they will not be able to run for political office, "because they have a conviction"; they will not get an 'Honour' "because they have a conviction", need I go on?
Shirley Brown, is a large dark-skinned woman, with an interest in her own Black culture, that's where she went wrong in Bristol. If she was an aunt Jemima-type, and "yes sarring" it out, she would have been one of their 'favourites'. She would have gone clear, as they say on the streets.
She commited the ultimate crime in racist britain, she was born dark-skinned, she's a woman, and she is largely into her culture and people. No judge in britain would NOT have convicted that woman for racially aggravated harassment.
Interestingly enough, this law has been aplied against Black people, (and especially Black women), for some time now. In ALL cases, these women, were the actual victims of the very crime they had been accused of.
Lets imagine it. After a meeting, whites are 'upset' that the 'uppity nigger bitch', "got the last word in". They are brewing, they are 'mad'...they can't let her get away with it. They collude, they plot, and eventually they telephone their judge 'mate' or even meet him at his house, and prepare him for 'the big one'. Judge, 'receives' said 'nigger bitch' in his court, and 'disposes of her' "like so...easy peasy..job done...another one bites the dust", she is officially "discredited".
The technique is so simple, so unaccountable, so smooth, it's almost embarrassing. This is almost like magic, "see, no hands". However, there are hands. There is police, CPS and judicial corruption written all over these cases, their fingerprints have been left all over the place.
So where do we go from here? If I was that way inclined, I be calling for a public Inquiry, but I hesitate, because anything that is less than statutory is a waste of time. Private prosecutions...lets see. UN report writing definitely!
What about the Slavery aspect to the Bristol case. Well, we did get a commemorative two pound coin in 2007 didn't we? So thats all right then!
Regardless of what has been agreed to at the UN, Europe and national level about the treatment of "descendants of slaves... and the slave trade", all we get are "convictions, convictions, convictions!".
So where do we go from here...where do you think? Upwards!
As for the 'discredited' judge, the system, and establishment, they are a joke! Do they really believe that the public are going to put up with this nonsense? Nearly everyone who has heard of the case are either seething with rage ( and want revenge), or are shocked to the point of laughing at the judge and the police.
If britain wants to regain any part of their international status on this matter, I suggest that they 'revisit' all the cases, of Black people framed and convicted using a law, that was frankly set up, to protect 'them' . Instead, this very law, is now regularly being used to prosecute the very said victims. Enough is Enough!
