PublicEye Corporate Responsibility Campaigns.

Tuesday, 22 January 2013

Queen Confesses That Gold 'Guineas' Belongs to Black English "West-Indian" Descendants of Slaves. She admits - 'Not ALL the Gold Bullion Belongs To US'. Gold Bars Held By Bank of England Owed To US in Reparations for Royal Family's Historical Involvement in Slave Trade.

Marcia Simpson-James.

Golden look: Her Majesty examines the stacks of gold bars stored in the Bank's vaults
Reparations!
Queen Admits Gold 'Guineas' Belong to Modern Black English "West-Indian" Victims of British Torture-Racism 
and the Royal  Slave Trade.


Royal Family and Establishment 'target' Black 
Women  for Torture and Human rights Abuses.


Hands-on: The Queen thoroughly inspects the gold vaults during her visit to the Bank of England
Queen handles Stolen Property (Gold Bullion) 
of  the modern victim descendants
 ("West-Indians"of British
 Historical Slave Trade and  European 
Royal Family's.




Monday, 21 January 2013

Sick Sodomite Sexual Predator Brig. General Jeffrey Sinclair Busy Sodomising & Raping Subordinate Men and Women In Afghanistan - Has He Been Raping Muslim Women Whilst Out On Duty? His Unbecoming, Perverted, Out of Control Behaviour, May Have Endangered The Lives of His Fellow Soldiers. This Disgraceful Man Is a Hardened Criminal.

Marcia Kia Simpson-James.

How many Muslims has this criminal Brig, Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair raped & Sodomised in Afghanistan and Iraq?
Shroud of secrecy: Brigadier General Jeffrey A Sinclair has been charged with forcible sodomy of female subordinates and was sent home from Afghanistan to Fort Bragg, North Carolina in May
Mentally Disordered Sodomite U.S. Brig. General 
Jeffrey Sinclair Raped, Committed Forcible Sodomy, 
Forced Junior Officers and Staff to give him Blow Jobs, 
and then bent them over his desk whilst threatening to 
murder his victims. Then his sick wife 'supports' him?!

Saturday, 19 January 2013

Mad White Racist Australian Homosexuals Claim They are "BLACK" & "ABORIGINES" Just So They Can Steal Black Educational Funds By Deception - Sick, Thieving, Worthless, White Trash!

Marcia Kia Simpson-James.
Danie Mellor
Two Mad, white sodomite Australians, claim
 they are "Black" and 'Aborigines' just to win
Educational Funding aimed at  Black youths
 and even Black women - They represent a
 'close-knit',  Mentally disordered group of sick
white racist homosexual political 'activists' that have

 spread back to Britain.

Friday, 18 January 2013

I Want Reparations From British Government For Torture - Django Unchained Film Opens Up British Slavery Trade Involvement - The City & Coffee House Merchants Formed Chartered Companies to Capture Slaves From African Chiefs and Kings Who Traded Us to The Caribbean, UK and America.

Marcia Kia Simpson-James.

To my Black Readers -
No longer for sale: The series of six action figures from the film are now unavailable from Amazon.com
Django Unchained 'Dollies' - Allow us to open up real slavery discussion, including Strong British and Royal involvement in selling, trading and granting Charters for British Slave Companies underwritten by 'The City' Jews and Coffee House merchants!

Saturday, 5 January 2013

Slavery Still Alive in Britain - "RCJ's "Slave-Master" Judges pass Poor Judgement on Black English People.



Dear Black Readers

Did you know that if you have the unfortunate experience of standing in a British court, in the UK, you are 'participating' in the official "Slave-Master to Slave" judicial system.

In the very last week of 2012, I found that I was in the Royal Courts of Justice, (The High Court), waiting to lodge legal papers to sue Lambeth Council (Brixton's responsible borough) and their leadership - the gist of the case racism!

There appeared to be a problem with some details, and I was 'referred' to  "The Master". I had never heard of a "Master" before. I looked back at the member of court staff, perplexed. She reassured me that it 'was alright'. This Black woman, had a big grin on her face.

I was curious, but unsure of what to expect. I followed the directions through the corridors of the courts, and   found myself in a small corridor. There was a small cue and everyone was speaking in whispers. There was a female bailiff, who was boasting, that she was there to get and Order signed so that she could repossess three houses. She was over-joyed, and appeared even more over-joyed, in the knowledge that she 'right' "Master" "was on". I asked this assortment of people, what to expect. Everyone seemed to be either struck dumb in awe, or over come with some kind of latent deference. Some of these people were trainee solicitors, some were solicitors, and there was even a barrister skulking around the corner.

When it was my turn, I entered a small room. I did not know what 'the procedures' or expectations were. I found myself sat in front of an extremely old white man, who wore a freemason's ring on his 'little pinky'. He feigned pleasantness, but I was not feeling it.

I described what I wanted, and showed him a document. The conversation lasted no more than 30 seconds. I was back out of the door. I wasn't sure what had just happened, but I wasn't impressed.

As I came out, an elderly court staff (slave) member, slid past. I was one of the last. Outside, was an African conman, called Alan Kamara-francis (of the Newham Legal Education Centre). He praised "Master---" heartily, and showed me a folder full of "qualifications". He told me that he was fighting 8 cases, and "Master ----", was "very very good". He mentioned that he had "strong contacts with Tony Blair" and that his wife "was the one in close contact with Cherie Blair". The country was Sierra Leone. I later discovered that this man was a conman who had conned hundreds of thousands of pounds from the British government in development and 'educational' grants and aid.

The next day in court, I felt I concerned about events of the previous day. I decided to go back to speak to this 'Master'. I went back along the same route along the court corridors and waited outside the same small room. As I stood waiting, another elderly white man, came from a small side door, and asked me politely if I wanted  "to speak to Master ---". I replied "Yes, if that is possible".

He went into the room, without knocking on the door. A few seconds passed, and then the same man came out, and directed me into the room. I stood in front of the desk, and the old man, looked offended to see me.

This put me off. This man offended me. He asked me grumpily "what do you want?". I began to speak, and he interjected, and asked "do you have the paperwork?". Since, that was not the purpose of my planned ,intended brief conversation. In fact, I wanted to asked a question.

I asked if I could sit down. He replied angrily "no", staring at the chair, placed directly in front of him and his desk.

He made some remark about "not being the Master on", and I immediately clicked that I had infringed some kind of in-house, legal custom or rule. I apologised for any misunderstanding, and explained that I had "never" had any dealings with this system in my life.

At this, the elderly white man's demeanour changed, and he seemed surprised that my politeness, left his in the shade. He suddenly, became polite, when I told him that I had been sent to his office, in the first instance, by court staff. I was subtly telling him that I had not 'just popped in', to see a utterly strange white man for no reason.

He turned behind himself, and held a maroon leather book open, and stared into the pages. He then informed me that there was another "Master on duty...at ..." such and such a room. I left. I eventually spoke to a white male member of court staff, and asked him to explain what the "Master" thing was.

What he described to me, was a de facto "Slave-Master to slave" relationship with "The People". I was upset, by the whole thing. Very patronising and immature. I felt like there as also an element of public school boy-university fellow stink of fake 'respectability' about the whole thing.

It didn't help, when I later saw the full "Slave-Master to slave" thing in living action. I decided to go and speak to this second "Master". Outside this room, was a group of young solicitors and lawyers, clearly working on what appeared to be a big case. There was a young asian woman, who looked nervous, and a 'rasta' guy.

This "Masters" room was in a different part of the court. I asked the solicitors if they were in the 'cue', at first they were reluctant to speak, but I asked again, and they answered that they did not know how this "Master" worked.

I then asked the 'rasta' man. He told me that he had gone to a Catholic Convent school (a slight shock to me, since I thought, only girls went to convent schools). He explained to me that "this reminds me of waiting to go in to see the Headmaster...its just like that". I didn't know what he meant, since, the only people I knew who had to sit waiting 'outside the headmistresses office', (I went to an all-girls school), were the 'rude girls'.

Since I had never had that experience, I was at a loss as to what he meant empirically. He had a big grin on his face. he went in, then after about ten minutes, Mr rastaman came out. He was grinning -ish. He went off.

It was my turn. I was shocked at the sight of what met me. There, behind a large desk, was a fat, old white man, wearing glasses. He pointed to a space in front of his desk, and said, in a loud voice, "stand there!".

I did not know what was happening. I wondered if this was a de facto hearing. I discussed with him the Andrew Mitchell "Plegate" situation and how I felt that this illustrated the behaviour of the parliamentary-diplomatic police as pathological liars.

I couldn't help but  gently cry, when it came to the part where I described, (in detail), how 6 armed SPG policemen, had circled me in parliament, and pointed their guns directly at my head, at point blank range.

He, prompted, and asked me what I wanted? and "when did this happen?" - he had pen in hand. I told, him, and he wrote the year, then threw his pen down in annoyance.

He said, " you're out of date...if you wanted to do something about it, you had 12 months...you're out of time". I apologised for the moment I had tears in my eyes. He replied, that he didn't mind, and that "you were extremely eloquent".

He appeared to believe and accept what I had to say.

We briefly discussed how the police had lied to such a degree, that it had affected, and damaged all parts of my life. I described police raids, and being kidnapped, falsely imprisoned, interrogated and tortured. He looked disturbed. He asked me "So what do you want me to do?".

He then cut me off, and turned to his computer screen. I left upset, but not surprised. I was slightly upset with myself, because, I couldn't help but well-up with tears, when I described and recalled how the 6 police thugs had pointed their guns at my head. The guns were so close, that if I had sneezed. They were all primed and there was one with a very thick neck, who took upon himself to 'guard' the revolving doors, just in case I returned into the foyer of that parliamentary building. As this one blocked my re-entrance into the building, the rest, were jumping up and down, and circled a wizzened old white man. They were all celebrating and grinning like cheshire cats.

This old man, who played as if he were a member of the public, later turned out to be a man called "Dr David James"of the 'Fixated Threat Assessment Centre.  He looked completeIy mad, absolutely crazy. Eyes glistening, and, like mad Ceasar, he was in the middle of this group of large police gunmen, laughing and being patted on the back. I take it as read, that if I had made the slip up and sneezed, Dr "Death" David James, would have conveniently been on the spot to "confirm [my] death".

But back to "The Master" slave court-police system.

The very next day, there was a story in the papers, about Black people and crime.  I can only think that there was a direct connection between my conversation with the the judge (Slave-Master) and me.

So, people, know this, that when you are stood in front of one of these judges in court, (whether as a defendant o claimant), you are stood on front of a modern day "Slave-Master" , live and direct.

Slavery, is not some kind of long-time-ago, 'historical' situation, they have Black people, under the hammer and the whip to this day (Saturday 5th January 2013). Now think of the stories were used to hear and read about the slave-master and their treatment of the slaves. Slavery is definitely still in effect.

Hence, the slave-master, has to be seen and judge, and jury, passing sentence, to prevent uprisings.

That day, in the last week of 2012, showed me what "Slave-Masters" look like. They are still alive and 'well', defending their slave system, whilst being aided and abetted, by weak Black men, and their white women, and their half-breed, black-hating, weak-blooded 'pickneys'.

This the new year, and all I can see, is the joy in the faces of the black slaves, as they recommended the RCJ's "Slave-Masters". The fight goes on, don't depend on the likes of idiots like Doreen Lawrence, or the Niggers in parliament, or the black boons in the civil service. In their world, it's 'every Black woman for herself!'

Wednesday, 17 August 2011

Race Riots (3) - Racist Magistrates Under Orders From Government to Send Everyone Up To Crown Court for Heavy Sentences. Sentences of 18 Month to 2 Years Debated.

Marcia Kia Simpson-James.

Yesterday (Tuesday 16 August 2011) I attended Camberwell Magistrates' Court again. I was struck that there was a very very young Black man (with cain-rows) sitting on the bench.

This ruse did not fool anyone, in fact, it was offensive. This court is notoriously racist, the clerks are racists, the black court staff are racist, the solicitors are racist, much less the security guards - who are racist, damn it, the whole cesspit should be cleared out.

This charade at "equality" offended members of the public, defendants and any intelligent observer.

The usual magistrate observed at that court, were white, elderly people, who clearly have never had a conversation with a Black person who isn't a defendant.

All defendants from the 'race riots' were looking at the bench as if they were being turned over.

A white mother of a defendant cried, whilst a white father sat in dazed silence.

On leaving the court, I decided to take a walk towards Brixton. I was horrified to see the mixed-racist criminal Lee Jasper speaking to his good friend and fellow criminal "Blacka Dred" outside the laters record shop on Coldhabour Lane.

Jasper looked shifty and scared as I approached. He pretended to be speaking on his mobile phone, as I walked by. I could feel eyes staring into the back of my head, and so turned around. There it was, Lee Jasper, and his gang crew.

A group of criminal Yardies were stood around him, I presume, taking orders from their  gang-leader, 'The Colonel'. What a frightening sight.

Before, this, I had been stopped by and elderly Black man, who explained to me that he was in his late 70's. We  physically stood across the road from the 'Barrier Block', (Coldhabour Lane). He told me that he believed that the the recent most Brixton riot had been orchestrated and organised by the police and criminals.

He said that he was concerned that decent Black people were being labelled as these criminals. I said that the criminals he referred to regarded interactions the police as a hazard of the job. He agreed. He asked me if I had noted that the 'Brixton Splash' (on the Saturday of the 'riots')  was 'organised' by 'certain people', and those people were friends of the 'criminal' Mark Duggan (man shot by police apparently in the back of a cab in Tottenham).

He said that corrupt police and criminals like Lee Jasper had got together and organised to 'trigger' a riot. He said that he knew a good few of the players and drank in the domino club across the road - implying he socialised with them.

He told me, that he did not like the Black chief executive of Lambeth. I asked him why? He replied that Derek Anderson was "a cruff" ( the lowest of the low).

I asked him what had 'been done' to Black people that we were faced with present circumstances? How was it possible to go from decent people landing in England in the 1940's and 50's to some of the terrible characters we had to put up with in the Black community? (rhetorical question).

His answer came in this form - he had brought his three children up in the area, and all of his children were all professional people. Say no more - I replied.

We parted after I thanked him for speaking to me. As I walked away, I knew I had food for thought.

Therefore, as I continued to walk towards Brixton along Coldhabour Lane, and on sight of gang-leader Lee Jasper, less than 5 minutes later, outside "Blacka Dreds" record shop, I thought to myself - how apt and speak of the devil!

Monday, 15 August 2011

Race Riots - Majority of People being Processed Through the Courts are Black Men and The Disadvantaged Living in Abject Poverty. Camberwell Magistrates' Court Youths Processed in Secret Courts and All Adults Are Being Sent to Crown Court for Trial or Sentencing - In Plain Language Guaranteed Imprisonment.

Marcia Kia Simpson-James.


 
Novella Noades 
This odd racist white woman is Chair of Magistrates
 at Camberwell  Magistrates' Court  

sat today with another 'magistrate' who
 looked like a young boy aged 12 years-old.

I believe that I may have been the single external observer, and observed events as they developed over time.


Court 1 & 2 were described as "the courts that deal with the rioters".


I watched from the public gallery in court number one. I had decided to attend as an observer despite still recovering from a recent urgent operation. It was worth it.


Security guards seemed energised at their courts  public profile being raised.


As case after case went by, it became patently clear that most of the defendants were still reeling from being detained. Most who came up looked bedrangled and disorientated in the glass-surrounded dock. All were escorted by two security guards each.


Many of the cases I watched related to defendants who had been caught 'looting' in Brixton. There was only one individual whose family - his elderly mother, her friend, his girlfriend, etc - came to support him. He was described as a "successful businessman". His mother had emptied her bank account of every penny so that she could stand surety for her son. It was a waste of time, he was remanded in custody until next month.


This man had apparently been 'swept up in events' between attempting to drop off his friend from his mother's home and Brixton He had inexpicably found himself  on the second floor of a sports shop, "wearing surgical gloves so that he could prevent his finger prints being traced in the shop". His explanation was that his friend and jumped out of his car into the shop and had started looting the place. He was apparently doing his 'community' bit by attempting to drag his unruly friend out of the shop, thus preventing crime. This man's solicitor, (Mr Reid), tried to make it seem as if this man should be given the Military Cross for bravery. This person had apparently been involved in 'organising' both the Brixton and Birmingham 'splashes', he was a promoter, comedian and an entrepreneur. A better citizen could not be found on the planet.


according to his solicitor, he was a "victim of circumstances". 


As I listened, I wondered, why anyone would own a pair of 'surgical gloves' outside of a surgeon, or other medical staff, much less feel the need to wear them to 'prevent his fingerprints being found all over the place'. I also wondered if he was one of the individuals who had torched the shop, thus removing most traces of evidence. How many burglaries had this crook committed? 


People's home had he invaded and trashed in his endeavours at being "a successful businessman"?


The mind boggles!


This criminal clearly had links to his controller Lee Jasper, as well as others who had influence over the start of the riots in Brixton. Apparently, he was also on his way to Lewisham, but was rudely interrupted by the police.


As i sat in the public gallery, I noted that this 33-year-old man's mother looked stunned when she realised that her son would be going to prison, and then onto Crown Court for trial. He looked non-plused.


In other instance, a wild-looking, Portuguese, mixed-raced man, with his hair loose and uncombed ( as if he wanted to look 'mad'), was identified as a possible paedophile, who had gone out and had exposed (his private parts) himself  "in the presence of children", arrangement were made for him to be seen and 'assessed' by a psychiatrist. The female interpreter looked sickened as she sat beside him. She clearly had no warning as to who her sub-client would be. After this man was sent down, the woman, walked out of the court room looking as if her next port of call was the bathroom to wash the grime off her skin.


Even I, could not have guessed that this kind of case could have come up under the circumstances.


There were Somalians, there were female drug addicts, and plain old-fashioned mentally disabled who appeared to pick up a tin of cat food, or biscuits during 'the riots'. Sat in the public gallery was a elderly man, with his walking stick who gave a running commentary. it turns out that his disabled son had been caught shop-lifting. He was one for the few freed into the arms of his father until his trial.      He had pleaded guilty to two out of three charges. I doubt whether he actually knew exactly why he was in court.


Then there was the Nigerians, who had been busy looting peoples passport to steel their identities. his three compatriots had sat suited and booted in the public gallery, looking as if butter would not melt in their mouths. As the case progressed, they all piled onto the front bench so that they could hear what was being said. They looked more and more worried as their scam was  exposed. Their country-man had not only stolen a number of passports during the riots, but it turned out that he was also an illegal immigrant and had given at least four false addresses to the court. He too was remanded in custody for Crown Court sentencing after pleading guilty. His friends looked horrified that he had exposed them by pleading guilty. They all rushed out of the court in a state of panic.


Then there was a Black west-indian man, who was outright freed, when the female prosecutor had decided that the charge of his carrying an offensive weapon was to be dropped.
the other charge had apparently also been dropped or he had been acquitted. The white-haired magistrate declared " you are free to go". There was a ripple of applause for him. He looked perplexed, but left after it dawned on him that he was completely free.


I was struck that ALL the prosecutors where Black. The lead was a very fat, wig-wearing Black woman, who appeared to be on some kind of weird power trip. 


In one instance, a young muslim woman, wearing a black head-scarve sat beside me crying her eyes out. I gave her a tissue. she told me that her brother had been caught. I was slightly sympathetic. The young man, appeared to be extremely young, he was so short and slender, I assumed he was approximately 13-years-old. However, he must have been at least 18-years-old, since this was the adult court.


Then I heard his case, any sympathy flew out of the window. This dude was one of the rare dangerous hombres. He was the exception to the rule where these defendants were concerned. He was held in remand and onto Crown Court.


Then, there was the idiot Oxford graduate sociology research student (a girl approximately 21-years-old) who came in dressed in a hippy outfit, consisting a grubby grey and red banded jumper, some dark green tights, a tweedesque jacket and some dirty boots. Then to increase her power, she carried her text books in her hand, whilst simultaneously carrying a odd-looking dusty ruck-sack over one shoulder. She then proceeded to throw all her gumbings in a corner. She then asked a Black man sat behind me, whether she could sit beside me. He nodded an affirmation. She then looked at me, and looked at my crisp white shirt with an expression of intimidation and trepidation. I carried on listening to the ongoing case ignoring her.


She found a seat next to a mixed-race woman, sat in front of me. This woman appeared to be having 'fun' in the court, and proceeded to ask me if I were on Tweeter, etc. 


The mixed-raced woman looked as if she had come as 'Carmen', complete with a large red rose in her hair. These two seemed to hit it off, with the mixed-raced woman telling the graduate where the dock was placed in the court. 


She looked completely gutted when the next case up was the 'flashing' , mixed-race paedophile. She only perked up, when she thought a Black man was up on some heinous crime. In reality she was sorely disappointed. Ms Oxford, pulled out a piece of paper, and flashed it for a moment, she then said that she had been told to go to the court at 'Highbury', but did not 'know London'.  


Oxford-girl, did not know anything. She began to discuss how she could access some of these Black men for a 'research group'. Apparently, the court officials had given her the cold shoulder and frozen her out.


'Carmen' explained to her, that she had to 'make friends' with the security staff, and the 'ordinary workers' since those 'up top' were 'guarding their turf'. 'Carmen' had earlier made a point of telling me, that she had gone to the court in Greenwich  and "everyone...men, women and even children" were 'up'. According to her, Camberwell court was much more "exciting". She told me that she was being 'followed' via tweeter by "staff at the BBC". I shuddered at the thought.


I had gone into court 2 to watch. I was shocked to see a white woman, who had an odd look and feel about her, with, (what seemed to me), a young boy sat beside her. 'The Boy' looked uncomfortable when he realised I was in the public gallery. At that stage, they were listening to a case where a 'couple' were accusing each other of 'stalking'. Their was wanton drunkeness, beatings, other forms of violence and verbal abuse. All involved appeared to be Irish. I left.  I can not explain it, but there was a odd vibe around those two individuals on that bench in court number 2. I returned to court No.1.


Cases ended at 4.30pm. As I left, a security guard asked me if the cases had finished. I responded "yes". He informed me, that if I wanted to come back to report, I should feel free to come back. I nodded my acknowledgment.